Web hosting is the most common method used by most companies nowadays to create, post, and manage a webpage or website on the internet. The two broad categories of popular web hosting services are traditional web hosting services provided by a web hosting provider, and cloud hosting services. One of the leading contenders in cloud hosting is AWS – Amazon Web Services. If you are in a dilemma to choose between traditional hosting services or AWS, go through this blog that compares both services to help you finalize a decision.
Traditional web hosting depends on one machine only, and there are many companies that provide traditional web hosting services. You have to choose the best web hosting company if you are looking for web hosting services. For example, you can check out siteground reviews to know what people are saying about the hosting companies.
The traditional web hosting services usually consists of two options. They are shared hosting, and dedicated hosting. In shared hosting, you share a server with many other websites and customers. In dedicated hosting, you own a complete server to yourself. It’s essentially buying a computer and having a hosting company manage it to ensure it stays up and running, and connected at all times.
What is Amazon Web Services?
Amazon Web Services, AWS, is a virtual web hosting services popular among most organizations nowadays. The hosting service was launched in 2002 by Amazon, offering a cloud-based approach to hosting. Overcoming the different obstacles faced in traditional web hosting services, AWS is a popular option among leading companies across the globe. Along with being highly user-friendly, AWS is a cost-effective and secure way to configure, create, and manage a website.
Amazon has 2 types of cloud hosting, They are
- Standard and
- Dedicated hosting.
A standard Amazon EC2 instance is basically a virtual private server. What’s somewhat unique to Amazon in this respect is that they allow you to provision or retire many virtual servers through an API, without any intervention from Amazon.
Amazon gives customers the option of choosing “dedicated” EC2 instances. In this configuration, a customer pays for all of the virtual hosts that may belong to a specific machine. This is chiefly to eliminate the issue of multi-tenancy, since hypervisors manage hardware resources.
Comparing Pros and Cons of AWS and Traditional Hosting Web Hosting Providers
The reasons why companies are using AWS instead of web hosting providers are as follows.
- High-availability (eliminating SPOFs: single points of failure)
- Distributed infrastructure, reducing latency to all regions of the world
- Cost savings (scaling down hardware to avoid overspending)
- On-demand infrastructure for scaling applications or tasks (adding servers or “horizontally scaling” to massively increase the hardware power available to your application)
- Resource planning convenience and cost savings. You don’t have to run your own data center for internal or private servers, so your IT department doesn’t have to make bulk purchases of servers which may never get used, or may be inadequate, and you don’t have to pay an entire IT department to maintain that hardware — you don’t even have to pay an accountant to figure out how much hardware you can afford or how much you need to purchase.
AWS Cloud Adoption Framework creates work streams that analyze the gap between your existing skills and processes and the ones that are needed, and these work streams are recorded as inputs. These inputs are the basis for creating an AWS CAF Action Plan to guide your organization’s change management as you journey to the cloud. However, there are few disadvantages of AWS when compared with traditional hosting by a web hosting provider. They are as follows.
This only matters when you are a really big player in the data. When your company grows to a size larger than snapchat/instagram , then you might think of having your own servers to reduce the costs. Though it’s a lot of overhead and burden with heavy risks , but it is helpful to reduce down costs significantly
Hardware level changes
You might think about having hardware level changes according to your application needs for the best performance and usage of your applications, which is not possible by Amazon.Many companies including Google and Facebook have done this to reduce down their costs and be achieve more out of less resources.
Recently AWS s3 went down and with that many big websites such as pinterest and others which had their servers in the us-east and us-west region went down. Depending upon one provider is not recommended in the cloud world. Anything can happen anytime with your business.
While amazon states that you can encrypt data and keep it safe , on a large scale Amazon might be using data for big applications for their personal profits in machine learning, artificial intelligence, etc.
Thus, by keeping the above things in mind, you can opt for cloud hosting by AWS or web hosting by a web hosting provider.
About the Author
Savaram Ravindra is working as a Content Contributor for Vmonlinetraining. His passion lies in writing articles on different niches which include some of the most innovative and emerging software technologies, digital marketing, businesses, and so on. Follow him on LinkedIn and Twitter.